Although the big-budget film adaptation of Stephen King’s It improved the miniseries in many places, TV’s It made 1 Monster better.
While both versions of Stephen Kingit is This letting fans down when it comes to Pennywise’s much-hyped final form, in retrospect, the 1990 miniseries did a much bigger bang to bring the spider monster to life than 2019’s. It: Chapter 2. The end of Stephen King’s horror novel This always posed a problem for anyone who intended to adapt the bestseller. The novel offers a slew of gruesome incarnations of the titular terror but, while imagery like a ravenous werewolf and a creepy razor-toothed clown are relatively easy to pull off live, the idea of a crab/ multistory spider is the kind of monster that tends to work better in print than on screen.
While many of King’s adaptations change and include elements of the source material that aren’t likely to play well live, not every film made from the author’s work can take as many liberties as the dark humor of the director Stanley Kubrick. the brilliant. The two 1990s This miniseries and ThisThe two-part film adaptation attempted to bring the spider monster from the book to life (albeit in very different ways), with the creators of both adaptations no doubt knowing that fans would be furious if Pennywise’s final form was missing from the movie. either screen version of the novel. However, the screen version’s spider monster wasn’t impressive enough to warrant inclusion in the Stephen King miniseries or movie. This.
That said, compared to each other, a version of ThisThe spider monster is the clear winner over the other. 1990s This The miniseries was infamous for its unintentionally hilarious spider monster at the time of its release, which made for a pretty daunting final boss after all the solid scares Pennywise’s clown form Tim Curry offered earlier in the series. However, the monster seen at the end of the This the miniseries is at least done with practical effects, unlike the far more disappointing clown-crab-spider thing of It: Chapter 2‘Sending in progress. This iteration of the villain was a crushing disappointment that proves the miniseries wasn’t so weak after all, and almost completely ruined the two-part film adaptation in its final moments.
Why It Miniseries Fans Hated The Spider Monster
it may be better than the latest hit iteration of the same monster, there are major issues with the 1990 miniseries’ version of Pennywise’s true form. While previous Stephen King miniseries like the next remake Salem Bundle hid their modest budgets with effective and terrifying makeup effects for their villains, the spider was just too big and ambitious for a television adaptation to succeed effectively. On a rewatch, the practical effects are janky even for the era, and what’s more, the closing scenes are over-lit, meaning there’s nowhere for the effects to hide. This means viewers see the spider monster in all its glory for long periods of time onscreen, and the creature’s design is more weird and fantastical than aggressively creepy. The 1990 miniseries monster is reminiscent of 80s fantasy movies like Legend and The never-ending story more … than Extraterrestrial, The thing, Where galaxy of terror, and seems out of place in such a dark and mature horror series. Even the giant killer rats from Stephen King’s 1990 adaptation quarter of cemetery obviously looked meaner than ThisThe final form of , which has too much in common with the fantasy monsters of the ’80s and not enough with the most gruesome and gross monsters of the decade’s R-rated horror films.
Why That: Chapter 2’s Spider Monster Was Worse
While the monster in the miniseries may be more fantasy than outright scary, it’s at least solid, with Penynwise’s final form having real depth and tangible weight (as evidenced by the cast struggling to topple the monster). at the end). In contrast, It: Chapter 2The Spider Monster is done largely through CGI, resulting in inconsistent scale, a weightless, artificial look that robs it of a menacing presence, and a few misguided design changes. Like Rebecca Ferguson Dr. Sleep antagonist of the same year, It: Chapter Two’Pennywise’s final form is proof that CGI alone doesn’t guarantee a creepy villain. Adding clown elements to the spider made the sequel’s mismatched monster hopelessly comical and resulted in a much less creepy threat, which was made worse by the fact that the spider monster’s CGI wasn’t up to par. the height of the standard established in the previous film.
Where 2017 This featured a twisted, shapeshifting Pennywise that was never too surreal to be taken seriously, the spider-clown monster was another case – alongside It: Chapter 2The vomiting leper, his ten-foot-tall naked old woman and his giant lumberjack statue – from the sequel upping the effects budget, but not taking the realism and fear for the ride. While some of King’s best recent projects like Shudder horror show brought practical makeup effects back to the forefront of their horror, It: Chapter 2 chose to focus on extensive CGI that ultimately fell flat for audiences who wanted a more immediate and concrete threat than the weightless, unintentionally clumsy giant spider clown.
Did The Spider Monster Ruin It: Chapter 2?
Ultimately, Pennywise’s final form can’t be blamed for ruining It: Chapter 2The prospects for a sequel, though that’s one of the many things that keeps the second film from living up to the standard set by its superior predecessor. The monster is not what drags It: Chapter 2 down, but that doesn’t help a film that was already laden with an overly long and repetitive story. It: Chapter 2The wobbly tone and overly long runtime were bigger issues than the specific monster, though the disappointing creature certainly didn’t help the sequel’s case. The fact that the giant clown-faced monster crab appeared in the same movie as the legitimately disturbing opening hate crime sequence proves that It: Chapter 2 never quite knew what it was trying to be and couldn’t choose between light, effects-heavy comedy horror or dramatic, mature, dark straight horror. This question was something that was the least unequal Stephen Kingit is This the miniseries didn’t suffer as much, despite being cheesy and dated.
More: Stephen King: Adapting Every Different Season So Far
Sony Admits The Amazing Spider-Man 2’s Rhino Was Terrible
About the Author